Skip to content

Four Reasons Why Nonprofits Should Follow More on Twitter

October 10, 2011

How nonprofits choose to follow on Twitter varies widely. Some nonprofits only follow a small of amount of Twitterers, others follow hundreds or thousands, and a few follow more (sometimes a lot more) than they are being followed themselves. However, from browsing more than 80,000 nonprofits on Twitter over the last three years, the vast majority of nonprofits follow a lot less than they are being followed. My guess is that they don’t want to follow a lot of Twitterers because they don’t want to clutter their “Home” feed, and I understand that, but nonprofits can easily manage the chaos of following hundreds or thousands Twitterers by simply organizing them into Twitter Lists.

Now, I know that following on Twitter (who and how many) can be a very personal decision and I don’t mean to insist that all nonprofits should follow more often, but I do at least want to  throw the idea out there that following more could help your nonprofit get more followers and thus much more buzz on Twitter.

1) Each new “Follow” results in more exposure for your nonprofit’s avatar, and thus likely more followers of your nonprofit.

Every time you follow a new Twitterer that is one more time that your nonprofit’s avatar is seeded throughout the Twitterverse. For example, at @nonprofitorgs I only follow nonprofits, nonprofit staff, and a handful of nonprofit service providers. As of today that number is 82,250. That’s 82,250 times that the @nonprofitorgs account and avatar is visible throughout the Twitterverse. If I was only following 250 Twitterers, then that’s 82,000 lost opportunities to get my avatar out there on Twitter.

Also, many people browse through Twitter accounts looking at who they follow to find new people themselves to follow, and if your nonprofit doesn’t follow many, then mathematically your chances of getting new followers through this method is severely hampered. There is absolutely a math to Twitter, and social networking in general, and the lower your number(s), the lower your potential for synergy. That doesn’t mean you should go on a follow binge and follow thousands on Twitter if it results in you following more Twitterers than are following you, but it does mean that if you have 3,000 followers but only follow 50, for example, then you might want to strategically try following more often and using Twitter Lists to organize your followers – if your goal is to get more followers on Twitter. Strategic following is covered in more detail in #4 below.

2) Your followers can not direct message you if you are not following them.

If you are not following a donor or supporter who is following you, then they can not direct message you. Let’s say you send out an event announcement in a tweet and one of your followers wants to direct message you to ask how to RSVP. Well, if you are not following them, then they can’t. They may still attend your event or they may quickly loose interest because the moment has passed, or worse they may feel a bit snubbed that you aren’t following them in return. Again, following more often just so your followers a.k.a. supporters and donors can direct message you on Twitter at the very least should make many nonprofits have a second thought about their current low-follow strategy.

3) Many of those that you follow will get an email announcing that you are following them.

Twitter allows users to decide to whether or not they’d like to receive email notifications of new followers under Settings > Notifications. I don’t know of any data that confirms a percentage of Twitter users who do so, but my guess would be 50%. Surely those who do opt-in for email notifications take notice when an email arrives in their Inbox exclaiming “Such-and-such nonprofit is now following you on Twitter!” However, if your nonprofit rarely follows new Twitterers, then these emails never arrive.

4) Following more often likely leads to more followers for your nonprofit which then gives you the opportunity to follow others more strategically.

This is a bit difficult to explain, so please read carefully. Provided that the math of following more often results in more followers for your nonprofit, you are then given the opportunity to follow more strategically. Again, operating on the assumption that you should not follow more Twitterers than are following you (to some it will appear spammish or desperate) and that following on a 1:1 ratio or less is a best practice, then let’s say for example that on any given day when you login to Twitter you discover that you have gained 10 new followers since your last login. Using the follow more strategy, that doesn’t necessarily mean that you need to follow in return those same 10 new followers. Rather, of the 10 follow those that look to be genuine follows and not spam or those new to Twitter with no logo or bio… let’s say that’s four of the 10. Then, your nonprofit now has the opportunity to strategically follow six new Twitterers, such as foundations, other nonprofits, bloggers, and media who then will possibly receive an email exclaiming that your nonprofit is now following them on Twitter, or they see you in their “Followers” list, or both. That could lead to these same foundations, nonprofits, bloggers, and media following you in return which is exactly why most nonprofits are on Twitter!

Whether you decide to experiment with this strategy is of course up to you and your own Twitter instincts, but I do hope at least you’re pondering it. It takes more time and a deeper commitment to Twitter, but as a practitioner of this strategy, I am here to tell you that’s it’s been worth it. 🙂

Related Links:
Webinar: How Nonprofits Can Successfully Use LinkedIn and Twitter
Book: Social Media for Social Good: A How-To Guide for Nonprofits

11 Comments leave one →
  1. October 10, 2011 7:48 am

    Thanks so much for this post. The reasons for following more are important and you’ve done a good job explaining each of the reasons.

    But for me, an even more important reason for nonprofits to follow others is to demonstrate that the nonprofit is in the Twitterverse to share and learn. It is, after all, a “social” medium. I assume, based on my experience of many years with nonprofits, that this following behavior reflects at least somewhat of their overall reaching out, connecting, and collaboration approaches.

    Furthermore, I presume that some of the non-following behavior is a function of joining the social media world without an articulated plan for doing so.

    Thanks again!!

  2. kim permalink
    October 10, 2011 11:05 am

    From a development perspective I would argue that “following” twitterers is also a way to engage more directly with those individuals who might just be unlikely donors as well as strong advocates for your organization. “Following back” and occasionally retweeting those people who are interested in your work shows a sign of respect and mutuality in working toward your organization’s cause. I personally have felt like a more engaged insider after being followed and retweeted by an organization I had an interest in, and I am more likely to continue to support those organizations with my time and contributions in the future.

  3. October 10, 2011 11:50 pm

    uhmmm..well..twitter if anything is campaign aligned for almost immediate responses, since the vast majority of Twitter feeds come from phones, and other portable or mobile devices. So, the static nature of having a following, MUST be enhanced with regular ‘calls to action’ like sharing the feed, etc.

    To use twitter effectively, it is Imperative that you have a fluid understanding of your followers, AND if you are going to follow anyone, follow someone that blogs off Twitter, and has a vibrant following combined, AND leans towards supporting your area of interest.

    Patrick D.
    Chief Encouragement Officer
    In Business4Good Enterprises

  4. October 11, 2011 12:50 am

    Thanks for these valuable hints. I particularly appreciate number 4, because it shows well how the 1:1 following : follower idea should be interpreted.

    Of course, there are also various tools, to facilitate the strategic search for new Twitterers to follow, but that’s beyond the scope of this post, I assume.

  5. October 25, 2011 8:11 am

    Duh. Why participate in social media if it’s not a two-way dialog? 🙂


  1. 24 October – a guide to media licensing, changes to Facebook and maintaining your online image | Good Comms News
  2. Corinne’s Favorite Blogs | Nonprofit Website Project
  3. Five Types of Nonprofit Tweets Guaranteed to Get Retweeted « Nonprofit Tech 2.0 Blog :: A Social Media Guide for Nonprofits
  4. Twittering in the non-profit community sector « areejfaisal
  5. 22 Must-Read Updates to Social Media for Social Good: A How-To Guide for Nonprofits « Nonprofit Tech 2.0 Blog :: A Social Media Guide for Nonprofits
  6. Five Types of Nonprofit Tweets Guaranteed to Get Retweeted | Philanthropegie

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s